Just finished making the epicyclic gear clock. I really think this pawl system would fix the SP7 clock. The second hand would not be able to jerk back and this ratchet and pawls are completely silent! As much as I do like the tic tocs, after a while they get to you especially when you have five or 10 clocks in the same room lol.... I'm going to see if I can create this pawl system for the SP7. I also want to create a base for this clock to have the coil and batteries and pendulum driver board out of sight.
top of page
Note: Wix forums will be deleted on 15-Oct-2025 and moved to the tab labeled "Groups". Hopefully, it will be easier to use than the existing forum
bottom of page
Thanks for pointing out the alternative designs. That clock has a really large pendulum amplitude.
A re-design of my version is on my project list, but it may be a while before getting around to it. I had a lot of trouble with the pendulum losing amplitude from even a tiny bit of friction in the pawls. The commercial electronics don't provide enough energy per pass to restore the friction loss.
I suspect your clock uses a lot more power. It makes it much more reliable at the expense of battery life.
Steve